💰 LUX Founder Puts Up $1 Million Reward Over Kinnara Money Trail

In a move that reads like a courtroom drumroll, the founder of LUX Property Group has publicly offered a $1 million reward to anyone who can produce verified evidence that executives from Kinnara did in fact transfer the full AUD $9.3 million in question — and that no funds were diverted elsewhere.

At the center of the dispute are:

• Adrian Campbell, CEO of Kinnara
• Hilton Wood, CFO of Kinnara

🔍 The Core Allegation

According to LUX, an internal audit conducted after buying out Kinnara from the Marina Bay City joint venture uncovered a shortfall of between AUD $4 million and $5 million.

Investor payments totaling AUD $9.3 million had reportedly been directed to:

• Marina Bay Lombok Pty Ltd

LUX alleges that not all of those funds were transferred to the legitimate joint venture company:

• Marina Bay Investments

Kinnara executives deny wrongdoing.

Their public defence has reportedly centered on a short video allegedly showing selected NAB transfers. LUX argues that showing some transfers does not prove that the full $9.3 million was transferred.

🏢 The Copycat Company Question

Another focal point is:

• PT Marina Bay Group

LUX claims this entity was established without joint venture authority and that shares were issued to entities allegedly controlled by Adrian Campbell.

Key public questions include:

• Why was this company created?
• Why were shares not issued to the joint venture partner?
• Were investor funds directed there?

Kinnara denies wrongdoing.

📊 Client Contribution Dispute

LUX further alleges that Kinnara promised to deliver significantly higher client volume into the project in exchange for its 50 percent stake.

According to LUX:

• Only around 10 percent of joint venture clients were allegedly sourced by Kinnara
• Some clients were allegedly redirected into non-JV entities

Kinnara disputes these characterisations.

🌐 The GIM Trading Shadow

The dispute unfolds against the backdrop of investigations into a previous company:

• GIM Trading

Approximately AUD $23 million of client funds are reported missing, with regulators examining transfers including roughly $17 million allegedly sent overseas.

Adrian Campbell has previously stated he sold the company prior to the losses. Reports indicate that when asked for sale documentation, he said he could not locate the documents.

No criminal conviction has been announced.

📂 “Show the Documents”: The Simple Way to Clear the Name

The position being advanced is straightforward.

If Kinnara and its executives have done nothing wrong, the fastest way to silence allegations is not commentary, not selected screenshots, not short banking videos.

It is full documentary proof.

What Would Resolve the $9.3 Million Question

To conclusively disprove any diversion:

1️⃣ Full bank statements for Marina Bay Lombok Pty Ltd covering the entire relevant period, showing:
• All investor receipts
• All outgoing transfers
• Opening and closing balances

2️⃣ A complete reconciliation demonstrating:
• Total funds received equals $9.3 million
• Total funds transferred to Marina Bay Investments equals $9.3 million
• Or a fully documented breakdown of authorised project payments

3️⃣ Clear evidence that no investor funds were diverted to:
• PT Marina Bay Group
• Or any other entity allegedly outside the authorised joint venture structure

If all $9.3 million was properly transferred or legitimately applied, full statements and reconciliations would settle the matter decisively.

🔁 The GIM Trading Parallel

A similar argument applies to:

• GIM Trading

Approximately AUD $23 million in client funds are reported missing.

If the company was sold prior to losses, documentary proof should exist:

• Executed sale agreement
• Proof of purchase consideration
• ASIC or corporate registry filings
• Evidence of who authorised transfers and where funds went

Corporate transactions of that scale leave extensive paper trails.

⚖ A Single Standard

The argument being advanced is simple:

If the money was fully transferred — show the complete statements.
If the company was sold — show the executed agreement and registry filings.
If overseas transfers were legitimate — show authorisations and destinations.

In disputes involving millions of dollars and investor funds, credibility is not restored by fragments.

It is restored by full, verifiable documentation.

Until such documentation is produced, the questions will continue to circulate.

And ultimately, the answer lies not in commentary —
but in bank records, contracts, and independently verifiable evidence.