Topline
The Justice Department on Monday urged a federal appellate court to reinstate criminal charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia—who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador by the Trump administration last year—three months after a federal judge dismissed human smuggling charges brought against him.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia arrives for his first check-in at the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Baltimore Field Office the day after a federal judge ordered his release from a detention in Pennsylvania.
Getty Images
Key Facts
In a filing made before the Sixth Circuit appeals court, the DOJ claimed the government had clear “probable cause and multiple legitimate bases to prosecute” Abrego Garcia and argued that the earlier ruling relied on “dubious assumptions” to drop the charges.
In his ruling that dropped the charges in May, Tennessee federal judge Waverly Crenshaw noted that the case reflected an “abuse of prosecuting power” and “vindictive motive” due to Abrego Garcia’s lawsuit challenging his deportation to El Salvador.
The latest filing argued that the DOJ reopened a criminal probe into Abrego Garcia after courts ordered his return to the country that it “previously closed following his removal,” and the human smuggling indictment was brought based on “new evidence.”
The filing also argued that acting U.S. Attorney Robert McGuire brought the case against Abrego Garcia based on a probe triggered by a 2022 traffic stop, and that he “himself had no stake in Abrego’s removal suit.”
The DOJ argued that the human smuggling charges were brought against Abrego Garcia due to legitimate concerns about his return to the country after a court reversed his deportation.
In the filing, the Justice Department urged the appeals court to reverse the Tennessee federal judge’s ruling dismissing criminal charges against Abrego Garcia.
What Had The Tennessee Federal Judge Said In His Ruling?
“The evidence before this Court sadly reflects an abuse of prosecuting power. The Court does not reach its conclusion lightly. The objective evidence here shows that, absent Abrego’s successful lawsuit challenging his removal to El Salvador, the Government would not have brought this prosecution. The Executive Branch closed its investigation on the November 2022 traffic stop. Only after Abrego succeeded in vindicating his rights did the Executive Branch reopen that investigation,” Crenshaw had said in his ruling.