The modern celebrity stylist is no longer hidden behind the image; they are helping author it. Law Roach with Zendaya captures the shift perfectly, showing how a stylist can shape not only a look, but the longer fashion narrative around a star.Law Roach and Zendaya are seen here togetehr backstage (Photo by Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame)
Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame
Law Roach has helped turn Zendaya into one of the most compelling fashion narratives of the modern red carpet through “method dressing”, and Harry Lambert has supported Harry Styles with a coveted wardrobe brilliantly bending masculinity, nostalgia and pop stardom into one recognisable visual language.
That shift is bigger than celebrity dressing. It speaks to a culture in which image now moves at enormous scale: the 2026 Met Gala generated 1.696 billion global video views and 108 million social engagements, numbers that make clear why the stylist now sits much closer to the centre of the frame.
The stylist was no longer a name buried in credits or whispered about in fashion circles, but part of the narrative itself, shaping not just how a person looks at a particular moment, but how they identify as a living brand.
Behind-the-scenes visibility has turned styling into part of the main event. Harry Lambert’s work sits inside that new culture, where wardrobes, process and visual storytelling travel far beyond the red carpet – something amplified again through the video-rich world around Harry Styles’ current tour. Harry Lambert seen here on the red carpet (Photo by Karwai Tang/WireImage)
WireImage
A red carpet appearance, a television interview, an airport sighting, a campaign image, a paparazzi shot, a front row, a press tour: all of it accumulates into a visual archive that shapes how a public figure is understood long before they speak.
Phill Tarling: Celebrity Stylist Talks Exclusively to Forbes on the rise & rise of the Power-Stylist. The stylist’s role now reaches far beyond dressing a moment. Phill Tarling has spent decades helping public figures translate identity into image, long before the profession stepped fully into the cultural spotlight.
Benjamin Ealovega 2024
Phill Tarling has seen that evolution from inside the room. He began styling in 1997, when the job was barely recognised in Britain as a serious career in its own right. What he describes now is a profession with a far larger burden and, increasingly, a far more visible authorship. “We’re not decorating moments anymore, we’re constructing legacies,” he told me.
That line lands because it catches the role exactly as it is now practiced at the highest level. A stylist is not only selecting clothes. A stylist is managing continuity, perception, aspiration, memory and, quite often, the public’s sense of who a person is becoming.
The Red Carpet Learned to Carry More Than Beauty
The red carpet used to be treated as a parade of prettiness, but that’s too simplified a reading in today’s viral-in-an-instant world. A look can extend a film, build authority, soften a reputation, sharpen one, suggest taste, signal values, revive a reference point from fashion history, or help move a client from one chapter of public life into another.
That change is one reason stylists have moved so visibly into the foreground. Audiences now expect clothes to do more than flatter. They expect them to mean something.
Tarling puts the shift in practical rather than romantic terms. “What’s fundamentally different now isn’t just the accessibility, it’s the accountability,” he said. “Back then I was dressing people for moments. Now I’m building narratives that outlive the photoshoot.”
Identity Work in Public
Tarling leans in to this point further: “I’m absolutely creating with my clients, not for them.”
Gone is the old idea of styling as decoration, replaced with something far more collaborative, more strategic and more psychologically attuned. What the best stylists are doing now is not imposing fantasy. They are helping clients make themselves legible.
Tarling speakers about his client roster and the need for them to be in their next chapter, not who they were yesterday. That is a subtle but important distinction. It moves styling away from clothes as surface and closer to clothes as translation. “There’s a version of every client that’s authentic and a version that’s strategic, and my job is finding where those overlap,” he said.
That is much closer to the truth of the profession than the usual clichés about glamour. Public dressing, at this level, is not random self-expression. It is a disciplined visual interface. The work lies in making that interface feel truthful rather than contrived.
Off-Duty Is Part of the Narrative Now
The public image of a celebrity or presenter no longer begins and ends at the obvious set piece. That has changed the working life of the stylist too. An “off-duty” moment can travel as fast as a formal appearance, and sometimes faster, because it seems to promise access to the unguarded self.
Tarling’s answer is not to over-style every waking hour. It is to build a wardrobe architecture strong enough to hold under pressure. “The smart approach isn’t staying camera ready 24/7; that’s exhausting and obvious. It’s building a default uniform that works when you’re caught off guard,” he said.
That is a useful insight, especially because it explains why so many of the most successful public wardrobes now feel controlled without looking over-managed. The work is done earlier. The fit, the jackets, the trousers, the repeatable standards, the pieces that hold under studio lighting or in daylight or at speed, that is where the discipline sits.
As Tarling put it more succinctly than most: “The difference between red carpet and off duty isn’t how deliberate it is, it’s strategic impact versus sustainable consistency.”
The Curtain Has Been Pulled Back
Fashion used to depend heavily on secrecy. Social media dismantled that world with startling speed.
Now the rail, the fitting, the tailoring, the jewellery tray, the mood-board, the backstage panic, the final adjustment, all of it has narrative value. Audiences no longer want the finished image alone. They want the labour around it, the care, the vulnerability, the human detail that proves the look was built rather than simply produced.
Tarling understood that earlier than many. “I’d been capturing behind-the-scenes content long before it became standard because I understood early that the story around the image was becoming as valuable as the image itself,” he said.
That feels like one of the critical observations in our conversation. It also explains why stylists now carry such a public charge. They are one of the few figures in fashion-adjacent culture who can speak to aspiration, process and expertise at once.
The “behind the scenes” has not weakened the mystique. It has simply redistributed it.
The Profession Has Grown Up in Public
Styling carries emotional labour, financial risk, logistical complexity and a degree of trust that the public often underestimates. People hand over not just garments, but vulnerability.
Tarling returned to that trust again and again. He talked about long-term clients learning to see themselves differently, not because they had been costumed into someone else’s fantasy, but because the process had helped them recognise what to foreground. “Most clients talk about how their lives are transformed by the styling process, and I don’t think that’s an exaggeration,” he said.
Taken lightly, that line might sound grand. In context, it did not. It sounded like someone describing a form of work that is as much about confidence, authority and self-understanding as it is about clothing.
That is part of why the public has become more interested in stylists. The stylist now occupies a very modern kind of expert role: visible, culturally literate, commercially aware, psychologically fluent and, crucially, useful beyond celebrity.
Substance Under the Performance
With more visibility comes the obvious danger that styling starts chasing performance for its own sake. Tarling was particularly clear-headed about that risk.
“Great styling, at its core, fully understands the brief,” he said. That is one of those sentences that sounds simple until you consider how much it contains. A boardroom is not a red carpet. A morning sofa is not a campaign shoot. A television presenter needs something different from an actor on a press tour. Even one client can require several different visual languages across a week.
That is where substance still separates the real work from the noise around it. Tarling’s distinction between image and identity was one of the strongest moments in our conversation: “Image is the surface. Identity is the architecture beneath it.”
One creates a look. The other creates coherence.
What the Next Decade Asks of the Profession
No serious conversation about image now can avoid technology, and Tarling remains realistic about AI, virtual styling tools and the degree to which basic advice will become easier to automate. What he did not see disappearing was the premium on human judgement.
“Face to face will remain the luxury experience,” he said.
The strongest stylists will use new tools where they are useful, but the work itself still rests on perception, trust and a much deeper understanding of people than technology alone can offer.
That is where the profession has arrived. The stylist is no longer arranging clothes around fame and hoping the camera will do the rest. The stylist is arranging meaning around visibility, and doing so in full public view, and the best have not become more superficial. They have become easier to see.

